AMD Ryzen™ 7 5700G 8-Core, 16-Thread Desktop Processor with Radeon™ Graphics

This thing is under-priced – but don’t tell AMD
– INITIAL EXPERIENCE AND iGPU IMPRESSIONThis is actually an OUTSTANDING Cpu. I bought it for building a test-bench with “OpenBenchTable” (you can look it up on youtube, they’re pretty sweet), and I figured it might be a good idea to have integrated graphics built-in. Boy, was I right. A video card that worked perfectly well with my other system (which I’m still using) for some reason would not participate in video output, even though its fans were spinning. As a matter of fact, if it weren’t for this iGPU, I probably wouldn’t have even been able to build my system. Once I got everything running and setup however, for some reason the video card I was just talking about suddenly started working (and it’s not a matter of drivers because we’re including the BIOS display here too).However – what I came to realize, to my great dismay and simultaneous delight, was that the built-in AMD Radeon graphics on this chip actually look BETTER than the mid-tier GTX 10-series that eventually started working. There was a washed-out and overly exposed character to the Nvidia graphics, while the Radeon built-ins came right out of the box looking rich, properly contrasted and – for lack of a better term – THICC… (plus, AMD’s display management software beats Nvidia’s any day, and this comes from a daily Nvidia driver)– IGPU PERFORMANCE (emulation gaming)Ok, so I didn’t build this test-bench for AAA gaming purposes. But I do like me some emulation, and I figured the G in “5700G” must have stood for “O.G.” So I threw on a PS2 emulator (PCSX2) and here are my very un-scientific results.Gran Turismo 3 was a little too stuttery at 2K (4x original resolution), though less than I thought; 4K was a no-go, though the system tried (6x original); and 1080p was ABSOLUTELY playable (3x original), and I plan to do it again sometime with a friend. You’d probably get the best outcome from 720, but I’m a little snobbish about my emulation standards.The entire CPU package itself got to 52° also, for what that’s worth, and the graphics processing ramped-up to 2000mHz. All-in-all, not bad for what you get especially considering how much emulators rely on V-ram (which there isn’t much of here).– CPU IMPRESSIONAs for the CPU itself, I’m equally impressed. I was ABOUT to click “buy” on the 5950X, since it seems to be the top of the line that AM4 will support as I went with a B550 motherboard instead of B650 for compatibility purposes (afterall, “testbench” remember?). I figured “well, it’s open-air, maybe I can get away with non-liquid cooling despite the 5950x’s product recommendation;” but then I realized I wouldn’t have had a grahpics backup, and as I mentioned, this would have been a disaster for not only my system setup, but also my wallet! So now not only am I saving on money and space, but I’m also saving on power as well. Win, win, win.– CPU/TEMP PERFORMANCE (non-gaming)Performance-wise, so far I’ve experienced no lagginess or lack of processing throughput thus far. It sticks around 4,000 mhz at any given time for basic tasks (3.7ghz to 4.5d), and alternates between low 30’s to low 40’s celsius.During non-overclocked performance testing (with Gigabyte autotune turned on) using Prime95, it hovered around 59-60° during a three minute “blend” test – but surprisingly, with “small FFT torture” it actually stuck around 55° instead. Only with CPU-Z multi-core stress testing did it get anywhere near 70° (and remember, this is with an open benchtable setup), so I’m really not worried about the temps – though I have no doubt their lower baseline due to this setup is probably contributing to its performance somewhat.Ambient temp of ~78° throughout.NOTE: This is with a bequiet! Pure Rock 2 FX, which looks really “benchin’” on my rig as well (see photo), and I’m sure is helping with those temperatures more than the included wraith cooler (which is still nice to have on hand as a backup). I also used Noctua NT-H1 grease this time, which seems to perform 1° better against Arctic’s MX-4 based on previous tests I did with my other system.– OPERATING SYSTEMSI forgot to mention, the operating systems I’ve deployed thus-far on this system have been:Windows 10Fedora Linuxand“Haiku” OS(yes, actually that)ALL of these have been completely functional right out-of-the-box, without the need for installing additional drivers. I only added the drivers for Windows 10 because I wanted the RADEON graphics management software, and also just to see what it would do. You could honestly live without them if you wanted because the hardware is simply so universally compatible. Giant plus there, especially for a workbench station.GIANT plus on AMD’s part for making dedicated software for multiple Linux distributions as well.– TAKEAWAYAfter this experience, I’m seriously considering looking into Radeon for any graphical expansions I might want to do with this board. I didn’t expect its initial output to be so utterly solid. My only concern would be size in that case, since this is a Micro-ATX that I’m working with and it seems a long GPU would actually cover the SATA ports. But I need to stop overdoing it with my drives so much anyway XD– BOTTOM-LINEIf you’re looking for something rock-solid for that lingering AM4 seat that can be relied upon under any conditions and you don’t want to spend a fortune, you CAN’T go wrong with this chip. Well worth the price, and well performing for the price range.

Powerful, versatile, and perfect if you’re not using a dedicated GPU (yet)
I bought the AMD Ryzen 7 5700G to build a PC that could handle daily tasks, work, light gaming, and even some editing all without needing a dedicated graphics card right away. And honestly, I’m really impressed with how it performs.Right out of the box, this processor feels fast, stable, and efficient. With 8 cores and 16 threads, it handles multitasking like a champ. I can run multiple apps, edit videos, use development tools, and stream without lag or freezing. Everything is smooth and responsive.What really stands out is the integrated Radeon Vega 8 graphics. For an APU, it performs surprisingly well. I’ve played games like GTA V, Fortnite, Valorant, and CS:GO at medium settings with stable frame rates. Of course, it’s not meant for ultra settings on AAA games, but it’s great if you’re gaming casually or waiting to upgrade your GPU.Thermals are well-managed. The included Wraith Spire cooler isn’t high-end, but it’s more than enough for stock performance and keeps temps under control. Since the 5700G is unlocked, you also have room to overclock if you know what you’re doing.Installation was straightforward. I used it on a B550M motherboard (with BIOS update) and Windows recognized it immediately. For office work, editing, media, or everyday use, it’s more than enough.To sum it up: if you’re building a PC that needs to work hard, run smoothly, and save you money on a GPU, the Ryzen 7 5700G is one of the best options out there. I highly recommend it, especially if you want a future-ready system that doesn’t require a graphics card from day one.

Ik denk ik probeer AMD eens een zeer efficiente cpu zonder twijvel met grafische chip. tot 4k 60 hz twee schermen loopt ook goed maar wat schertst de verbazing na wat heen en weer stunten met 2 980 pro’sdie ik nog had geen ondersteuning voor pci4 zeer eigenaardig voor een nog geen half jaar oude cpu.had ik natturlijk gelezen op twekers maar ja vergeten natuurlijk.toch blijf ik bij AMD want intel schiet niet op de laatste tijd komen ze eindelijke met een “betere cpu” met 125 watt en weet ik hoeveel cores en met 1700 pinnnetjes voor een niet te betalen moederbord meer dan 1000 voor het zelfde moederbord wat ik hier ook heb in 1 van mijn bouws maar dan 690 chipset en de genoeme 1700 pinnetjes in de socket die chip is niet beter maar boerenbedrog.

Excelente procesador, la verdad rinde bien.